3.9
Practicing Purposeful Skepticism
Submitted by Jack Byrd, Jr., Cuda Zmuda, & Eric Schmucker
New initiatives are often met with skepticism, which can be unproductive when based upon resistance to change. Purposeful skepticism, however, can be valuable when it opens up thinking and leads to improvements. This activity illustrates how to share skepticism with others in a purposeful way.
Learning Goal
Practice asking questions to better understand what is being proposed and to constructively imagine what can be done to improve the proposal.
Instructions
Set Up: Prepare for the Activity
Select a scenario from the collection of What IF…Scenarios, choose one of the sample scenarios shown below in Step One, or create your own based on a topic that is relevant for your group.
Organize participants into small groups (4-6 ppl).
Begin by introducing the learning goals of this activity.
Step One: Review the Scenario (5 min)
As a full group, invite a participant to read the scenario aloud while others read along. It may be helpful to share the scenario on an overhead screen if meeting in-person or use the share screen function if meeting virtually. Participants may want to read quietly and have a copy to refer to details later in the activity.
After reviewing the scenario, ask if there are any questions.
Sample Scenario No. 1: A Study Lab Proposal
As enrollment dropped at a major state university, the retention of students became a top priority. An analysis of the retention challenge led to a realization that failures in math and lab science courses were a leading cause of the dropouts. The university had learning centers for these courses but they were rarely used. A focus group with students led to a proposal that all first year students would be required to participate in a controlled study environment four hours per week. Tutoring would be provided and attendance would be monitored and built into the grade in the freshman seminar.
Sample Scenario No. 2: EV Recharging Proposal
The owner of a high-end townhouse complex wanted to provide recharging stations for the growing number of electric vehicles owned by the townhouse residents. Since the townhouses themselves did not have outlets for recharging, the owner proposed to have a set site area where residents could recharge their cars. Since the number of recharging stations was insufficient for all residents to use at one time, reservations were needed. Also some recharging stations were reserved for specific makes of vehicles. The owner feels this is a viable solution until more residents own EVs to warrant costly retrofits of all the townhouses with outside electric outlets.
Step Two: Generate Skeptical Concerns - Round One (10 min)
In small groups, ask each participant to answer the following two questions:
What assumptions are being made in the proposal or scenario?
What skepticism do you have about these assumptions?
Assign one participant in each group to record the assumptions and the skepticism shared, in the format shown below, on a shared surface that can be seen by all participants.

Step Three: Generate Skeptical Concerns - Round Two (10 min)
Ask each participant to independently share one response to the following two questions in a round robin style:
What might go wrong with the proposal?
What might be the possible impact?
Instruct the assigned notetaker in each group to record the responses, in the format shown below, on a shared surface that can be seen by all participants.

Step Four: Share Changes to the Proposal (10 min)
Invite each participant to independently write down their thoughts in response to the following question:
Assuming we continue to explore the proposal, what changes would you like to see?
Ask each participant to share one response to the question in a round robin style. Instruct the assigned notetaker in each group to record a brief summary of these responses so that all participants can see each idea.
Step Five: Share Improvements Needed to Say Yes (5 min)
Ask each participant to respond to the group using the following lead in:
I could say yes to the proposal if…
Step Six: Debrief as a Full Group (10 min)
How did you feel about sharing your concerns in this activity?
How did your understanding and feelings toward the proposal change by the end of this activity?
How would you have responded to this proposal if you didn’t work through this process? What would your initial response have accomplished?
TIME
50
min
MODULE
Critical Collaboration

This activity can be completed by any discussion group.

This activity can be easily modified for asynchronous learning. See Sample Asynchronous Certificate Program Design to illustrate sample sequencing.

This activity is suitable for professional or more formal learning environments.
Tell us what you think. Rate and review this activity:
Have any helpful suggestions or modifications for this activity?
Share them in the comments below!
0 Comments
YD
December 3, 2022 at 2:39:23 AM
Activity 5.4 uses the fun method of role playing and builds on other activities to help participants develop questions and practice gathering information to collaborate effectively with communities as partners. This activity involves working together in small groups and as a large group. It also includes multiple additional resources for participants to continue learning methods and skills to build community partnerships.
YD
December 3, 2022 at 2:39:00 AM
Activity 1.8 provides a very useful survey to gather information on and help support participants' different discussion styles and needs, exploring various areas like preferences for group size, ways of participating in discussions, any fears relating to discussions, etc.
YD
December 3, 2022 at 2:34:46 AM
Activity 5.8 further explores direct democracy by proposing the idea of "legislative juries" to improve the current initiative process through collaboration and deliberation. This activity uses role playing to have participants practice deliberation as part of a mock legislative jury to craft ballot initiatives on a given issue.
YD
December 3, 2022 at 2:27:35 AM
Activity 5.7 uses a fun and tactile activity like building LEGOs to explore the effects of coming together to colloborate and discuss, while also participating together in another physical activity.
YD
December 3, 2022 at 2:22:49 AM
Activity 5.6 uses memes and futuristic zombie scenarios to develop ways to change people's minds, while exploring various aspects of the methods used to change minds, like assumptions behind ideas, sticking to the facts versus stretching the truth, appealing to emotions etc.
YD
December 3, 2022 at 2:16:44 AM
Activity 5.5 uses a fun and visual/craft activity to help participants explore the many different types of knowledge, how they are valued, and the role/importance of each type of knowledge in their own lives.
YD
December 3, 2022 at 2:11:54 AM
Activity 5.3 gives participants to use writing, drawing, and/or speaking to share and discuss the various communities they belong to and/or feel excluded from, the various aspects that define community, as well as the practices of inclusion or exclusion and power distribution in these communities.
YD
December 3, 2022 at 2:07:26 AM
Activity 5.2 introduces four categories of stakeholders and multiple prompts to help participants work together in small and large groups to create comprehensive list of stakeholders, including those who are marginalized or not as obvious, for a given issue.
YD
December 3, 2022 at 2:04:00 AM
Activity 5.1 uses gamification by having participants play the Civics Topics Sweet Sixteen Competition to identify their issues they are passionate about both as individuals and as a group.
YD
December 3, 2022 at 2:01:34 AM
Activity 4.9 uses both lighthearted and serious characters, topics, and dialogue to help participants practice viewing an issue from the perspective of multiple people/characters and explain their thought processes and rationale for the choices they think these people will make in a given situation.
_edited.png)





