top of page

3.9
Practicing Purposeful Skepticism

Submitted by Jack Byrd, Jr., Cuda Zmuda, & Eric Schmucker

New initiatives are often met with skepticism, which can be unproductive when based upon resistance to change. Purposeful skepticism, however, can be valuable when it opens up thinking and leads to improvements. This activity illustrates how to share skepticism with others in a purposeful way.

average rating is 5 out of 5, based on 1 votes, rating(s)
Red neon light question mark on dark wall

Learning Goal

  • Practice asking questions to better understand what is being proposed and to constructively imagine what can be done to improve the proposal.

Instructions


Set Up: Prepare for the Activity

Select a scenario from the collection of What IF…Scenarios, choose one of the sample scenarios shown below in Step One, or create your own based on a topic that is relevant for your group.


Organize participants into small groups (4-6 ppl).

Begin by introducing the learning goals of this activity.



Step One: Review the Scenario (5 min)

As a full group, invite a participant to read the scenario aloud while others read along. It may be helpful to share the scenario on an overhead screen if meeting in-person or use the share screen function if meeting virtually. Participants may want to read quietly and have a copy to refer to details later in the activity.

After reviewing the scenario, ask if there are any questions.


Sample Scenario No. 1: A Study Lab Proposal

As enrollment dropped at a major state university, the retention of students became a top priority. An analysis of the retention challenge led to a realization that failures in math and lab science courses were a leading cause of the dropouts. The university had learning centers for these courses but they were rarely used. A focus group with students led to a proposal that all first year students would be required to participate in a controlled study environment four hours per week. Tutoring would be provided and attendance would be monitored and built into the grade in the freshman seminar.


Sample Scenario No. 2: EV Recharging Proposal

The owner of a high-end townhouse complex wanted to provide recharging stations for the growing number of electric vehicles owned by the townhouse residents. Since the townhouses themselves did not have outlets for recharging, the owner proposed to have a set site area where residents could recharge their cars. Since the number of recharging stations was insufficient for all residents to use at one time, reservations were needed. Also some recharging stations were reserved for specific makes of vehicles. The owner feels this is a viable solution until more residents own EVs to warrant costly retrofits of all the townhouses with outside electric outlets.



Step Two: Generate Skeptical Concerns - Round One (10 min)

In small groups, ask each participant to answer the following two questions:

  • What assumptions are being made in the proposal or scenario?

  • What skepticism do you have about these assumptions?


Assign one participant in each group to record the assumptions and the skepticism shared, in the format shown below, on a shared surface that can be seen by all participants.


Image of table format



Step Three: Generate Skeptical Concerns - Round Two (10 min)

Ask each participant to independently share one response to the following two questions in a round robin style:

  • What might go wrong with the proposal?

  • What might be the possible impact?


Instruct the assigned notetaker in each group to record the responses, in the format shown below, on a shared surface that can be seen by all participants.


Image of table format



Step Four: Share Changes to the Proposal (10 min)

Invite each participant to independently write down their thoughts in response to the following question:

  • Assuming we continue to explore the proposal, what changes would you like to see?


Ask each participant to share one response to the question in a round robin style. Instruct the assigned notetaker in each group to record a brief summary of these responses so that all participants can see each idea.



Step Five: Share Improvements Needed to Say Yes (5 min)

Ask each participant to respond to the group using the following lead in:

  • I could say yes to the proposal if…



Step Six: Debrief as a Full Group (10 min)

  • How did you feel about sharing your concerns in this activity?

  • How did your understanding and feelings toward the proposal change by the end of this activity?

  • How would you have responded to this proposal if you didn’t work through this process? What would your initial response have accomplished?

TIME

50

min

MODULE

Critical Collaboration

Tell us what you think. Rate and review this activity:

Have any helpful suggestions or modifications for this activity?

Share them in the comments below!

Rate this Activity (required)
Don’t love itNot greatGoodGreatLove it

0 Comments

average rating is 5 out of 5

YD

December 3, 2022 at 1:58:08 AM

Activity 4.8 provides useful phrases and techniques, as well as helps participants develop their own, to join in during discussions and express their views according to the goals they choose for themselves on what they want to offer to the discussion and how they want to be perceived.

average rating is 5 out of 5

YD

December 3, 2022 at 1:52:48 AM

Activity 4.7 uses a tactile and fun method, like a bag of beans, to have participants experience what it is like to have different amounts of power in a conversation. This activity also highlights how we base our ideas of how power is distributed on stereotypes.

average rating is 5 out of 5

YD

December 3, 2022 at 1:48:29 AM

Activity 4.6 employs useful tools like the Question Chart to help participants learn how to craft "good questions" that move beyond any assumptions they have about the views of others based on stereotypes or third party descriptions, and unearth their true views on the issue.

average rating is 5 out of 5

YD

December 3, 2022 at 1:45:08 AM

Activity 4.5 uses visual aids like the Emotion Wheel to push participants to move beyond just cognitive empathy and shows how to reflect back the emotions and understand their source through dialogue. It also helps participants differentiate between messages of intentional empathy and problem-solving.

average rating is 5 out of 5

YD

December 3, 2022 at 1:39:46 AM

Activity 4.4 uses both individual written reflection and discussion in small and large groups to explore the which aspects of a person's identity we use to determine if they should be included in the conversation on a particular issue. This activity also give participants to practice explaining and negotiating who is chosen.

average rating is 5 out of 5

YD

December 3, 2022 at 1:33:37 AM

Activity 4.3 uses physical movement and both lighthearted and serious topics to help participants see how positions on different topics lie on a continuum and how positions can change as one is exposed to new information or perspectives. Participants also flex their imaginative and creative muscle by arguing for the position opposite to theirs.

average rating is 5 out of 5

YD

December 3, 2022 at 1:28:28 AM

Activity 4.2 breaks down the individual aspects of active listening into separate rounds/steps to help participants consciously and methodically learn and practice this skill.

average rating is 5 out of 5

YD

December 3, 2022 at 1:25:28 AM

Activity 4.1digs deep into the many facets of social identity, by using drawing, as well as both written silent reflection and verbal discussion in small and large groups.

average rating is 5 out of 5

YD

November 29, 2022 at 6:26:51 AM

Activity 3.8 easily helps visualize the many dimensions of a topic by using the fishbone diagram.

average rating is 5 out of 5

YD

November 29, 2022 at 6:24:44 AM

Activity 3.7 provides useful mind tricks to help practice patience and giving people the benefit of the doubt, thus creating the sense of psychological safety required in collaborative efforts.

bottom of page