3.9
Practicing Purposeful Skepticism
Submitted by Jack Byrd, Jr., Cuda Zmuda, & Eric Schmucker
New initiatives are often met with skepticism, which can be unproductive when based upon resistance to change. Purposeful skepticism, however, can be valuable when it opens up thinking and leads to improvements. This activity illustrates how to share skepticism with others in a purposeful way.
Learning Goal
Practice asking questions to better understand what is being proposed and to constructively imagine what can be done to improve the proposal.
Instructions
Set Up: Prepare for the Activity
Select a scenario from the collection of What IF…Scenarios, choose one of the sample scenarios shown below in Step One, or create your own based on a topic that is relevant for your group.
Organize participants into small groups (4-6 ppl).
Begin by introducing the learning goals of this activity.
Step One: Review the Scenario (5 min)
As a full group, invite a participant to read the scenario aloud while others read along. It may be helpful to share the scenario on an overhead screen if meeting in-person or use the share screen function if meeting virtually. Participants may want to read quietly and have a copy to refer to details later in the activity.
After reviewing the scenario, ask if there are any questions.
Sample Scenario No. 1: A Study Lab Proposal
As enrollment dropped at a major state university, the retention of students became a top priority. An analysis of the retention challenge led to a realization that failures in math and lab science courses were a leading cause of the dropouts. The university had learning centers for these courses but they were rarely used. A focus group with students led to a proposal that all first year students would be required to participate in a controlled study environment four hours per week. Tutoring would be provided and attendance would be monitored and built into the grade in the freshman seminar.
Sample Scenario No. 2: EV Recharging Proposal
The owner of a high-end townhouse complex wanted to provide recharging stations for the growing number of electric vehicles owned by the townhouse residents. Since the townhouses themselves did not have outlets for recharging, the owner proposed to have a set site area where residents could recharge their cars. Since the number of recharging stations was insufficient for all residents to use at one time, reservations were needed. Also some recharging stations were reserved for specific makes of vehicles. The owner feels this is a viable solution until more residents own EVs to warrant costly retrofits of all the townhouses with outside electric outlets.
Step Two: Generate Skeptical Concerns - Round One (10 min)
In small groups, ask each participant to answer the following two questions:
What assumptions are being made in the proposal or scenario?
What skepticism do you have about these assumptions?
Assign one participant in each group to record the assumptions and the skepticism shared, in the format shown below, on a shared surface that can be seen by all participants.

Step Three: Generate Skeptical Concerns - Round Two (10 min)
Ask each participant to independently share one response to the following two questions in a round robin style:
What might go wrong with the proposal?
What might be the possible impact?
Instruct the assigned notetaker in each group to record the responses, in the format shown below, on a shared surface that can be seen by all participants.

Step Four: Share Changes to the Proposal (10 min)
Invite each participant to independently write down their thoughts in response to the following question:
Assuming we continue to explore the proposal, what changes would you like to see?
Ask each participant to share one response to the question in a round robin style. Instruct the assigned notetaker in each group to record a brief summary of these responses so that all participants can see each idea.
Step Five: Share Improvements Needed to Say Yes (5 min)
Ask each participant to respond to the group using the following lead in:
I could say yes to the proposal if…
Step Six: Debrief as a Full Group (10 min)
How did you feel about sharing your concerns in this activity?
How did your understanding and feelings toward the proposal change by the end of this activity?
How would you have responded to this proposal if you didn’t work through this process? What would your initial response have accomplished?
TIME
50
min
MODULE
Critical Collaboration

This activity can be completed by any discussion group.

This activity can be easily modified for asynchronous learning. See Sample Asynchronous Certificate Program Design to illustrate sample sequencing.

This activity is suitable for professional or more formal learning environments.
Tell us what you think. Rate and review this activity:
Have any helpful suggestions or modifications for this activity?
Share them in the comments below!
0 Comments
Shannon Wheatley Hartman
December 7, 2022 at 7:01:33 PM
Another all time favorite. I really recommend this activity when you are trying to think about the complexity of a social topic and who/what is impacted by it. It pairs well with the Divergent Thinking/Surround the Topic activity. This activity also includes a really helpful worksheet for capturing types of stakeholders.
Shannon Wheatley Hartman
December 7, 2022 at 6:59:07 PM
I really like this activity. It is a fun way to figure out what matters most to us as a group. For example, if you need to figure out the theme for a discussion series or a topic for a group project, try out this activity. It helps participants to reflect on their own civic passion but also negotiate together the civic passions of the group. It could be paired with the value activities in Module One.
Shannon Wheatley Hartman
December 7, 2022 at 6:54:13 PM
I the process in this activity ("surround the topic") a lot. It is particularly useful as facilitation preparation. It also helps with generative thinking.
Shannon Wheatley Hartman
December 7, 2022 at 6:52:01 PM
This is an all time favorite. Use it as a warm-up activity or whenever you have a group that feels stuck and can't think of new ways of engaging a topic or problem.
Shannon Wheatley Hartman
December 7, 2022 at 6:49:22 PM
Similar to the previous activity (1.7 Taking Inventory of CD Skills), this activity includes a google survey that participants can complete at the beginning of a program or class. Instructors or facilitators can use this information to then tailor future activities to best fits the discussion needs of their group.
Shannon Wheatley Hartman
December 7, 2022 at 6:46:46 PM
Use this as pre-class or pre-workshop preparation! These self-evaluations will help teachers or facilitators to better understand the starting point of each participant and an aggregate view of the group. The survey results are shared only with the instructor/facilitator. This is a really helpful resource (and you can modify the survey to fit your needs).
Shannon Wheatley Hartman
December 7, 2022 at 6:43:42 PM
This activity and the previous (1.5 Understanding Values) are great for difficult conversations. I would use this as the prep work before diving into potentially tricky conversations. It helps participants to look for the values that inform opinions (and not just dismiss ideas that they don't like).
Shannon Wheatley Hartman
December 7, 2022 at 6:41:01 PM
This is also known as "Identity Pie." It's a great warm up and way for participants to get to know one another. I would use this early in a group setting to help build connection.
Shannon Wheatley Hartman
December 7, 2022 at 6:39:24 PM
I think we all know that creating guidelines is important. I introduce activity 1.1 What is Collaborative Learning? first and then use the positive and negative attributes that they generate to help form our group guidelines.
Shannon Wheatley Hartman
December 7, 2022 at 6:36:43 PM
I always recommend that folks start off with this activity and pair it with 1.3 Creating Guidelines. It is a great way to set the tone and emphasize the importance of collaborative discussion.
_edited.png)





