top of page

4.3
Understanding Perspectives on a Continuum

Submitted by Janice McMillan

This exercise makes visible a range of views on an issue as well as how hard it is to take on the view of someone else. It helps participants become aware of how strongly held views can lead them to be dismissive of the views of others.

average rating is 5 out of 5, based on 1 votes, rating(s)
Hanging leaves in a spectrum of color from green to red

Learning Goals

  • Identify views or perspectives as a continuum and not as a binary.

  • Develop a deeper appreciation for how hard it is to actually take on the view of someone else.

Instructions


Set Up: Prepare for the Activity

Make it easier for participants to move around and visualize by taping paper signs to indicate a letter for each position and lanes on the floor for each place in the continuum (refer to this Continuum Map).

On one end of the room/space, draw a large “A” on a piece of paper and tape it onto the floor to represent position A and, on the other end, draw a large “B” on a piece of paper and tape it onto the floor to represent position B.

Take 6 sheets of paper, and write “Strongly Agree with A”, “Agree with A”, “Somewhat Agree with A”, “Strongly Agree with B”, “Agree with B”, “Somewhat Agree with B” on each sheet respectively.

Tape these sheets of paper down in between the position A and position B signs, so in the end, the sheets mark lanes in the following order:

Strongly Agree with A, Agree with A, Somewhat Agree with A, Somewhat Agree with B, Agree with B, Strongly Agree with B.

Use long pieces of masking tape to create a lane for each position.



Step One: Get Ready to Start (5 min)

Begin by introducing the learning goals of this activity.

Start with all participants in position somewhere on the Continuum Map drawn on the floor, ready to move.



Step Two: Choose Positions - Lightning Round (5 min)

As the facilitator, read statements that indicate two very different positions on one topic, for example:

  • What would you rather eat for lunch? A) a burger or B) a veggie wrap

  • Development is about: A) the alleviation of poverty, or B) increasing people’s capabilities

  • Freedom means: A) having choices, or B) being left alone to do as you like


As each statement is read, ask participants to take a moment to think about where they want to stand and then indicate their position on the continuum by physically moving. They can choose any position between the two extremes.


Try to encourage participants not to pick a position directly in the middle line, i.e. have no view or claim they are neutral on a topic.

Participants will not be asked to justify their positions, yet. Instead, ask them to remember their thoughts about the statements for the next step of the activity.




Step Three: Choose and Discuss Positions (10 min)

The next set of statements should be tailored to the area of concern for the group. For example, take the topic of “development.”


Read a more complex statement, such as:

  • If you were the head of the United Nations, would you A) prioritize projects focused on the provision of medicines, OR B) prioritize the education of young girls and boys?


Invite participants to think about their opinion and choose a position on the continuum. Invite participants to discuss why they are standing at a particular spot. Even though they are sharing a location, they might be there for very different reasons.



Step Four: Share and Reevaluate Positions (10 min)

Select representatives from each spot to share their thoughts. Engage in a discussion, switching back and forth from one end of the continuum to the other, as opinions and responses are shared.


If participants feel swayed by an argument on the opposite side from where they are standing, they can switch positions. For those who switch, invite them to offer a brief explanation of what persuaded them to move on the continuum.



Step Five: Practice Perspective Taking (10 min)

Repeat the activity with another statement, for example:

  • If you were a starving and politically oppressed citizen, would you rather be given A) food daily or B) the right to vote?


Ask participants to think about their opinion and choose a position on the continuum.

This time as participants discuss with their new group, ask them to develop an argument for the opposing view. Ask them:

  • What are people on the other end of the spectrum thinking?

  • What argument would they put forth to explain why they are on this end of the spectrum?


Participants will have to think from the other side’s perspective and put forth the strongest argument for the opposing view.



Step Six: Discuss with the Full Group (10 min)

Take turns sharing between groups. Make sure the full group takes the discussion far enough to come to a conclusion about what they believe as a group and/or individually. Clarity-seeking questions and examples can aid in this.



Step Seven: Debrief as a Full Group (10 min)

  • Which place on the continuum was easiest for you to occupy and why? Extreme ends or middle spaces?

  • When imagining what other groups thought or believed, which spaces were easiest/hardest to imagine?

TIME

60

min

MODULE

Culturally Responsive Collaboration

Tell us what you think. Rate and review this activity:

Have any helpful suggestions or modifications for this activity?

Share them in the comments below!

Rate this Activity (required)
Don’t love itNot greatGoodGreatLove it

0 Comments

average rating is 5 out of 5

YD

December 3, 2022 at 2:39:23 AM

Activity 5.4 uses the fun method of role playing and builds on other activities to help participants develop questions and practice gathering information to collaborate effectively with communities as partners. This activity involves working together in small groups and as a large group. It also includes multiple additional resources for participants to continue learning methods and skills to build community partnerships.

average rating is 5 out of 5

YD

December 3, 2022 at 2:39:00 AM

Activity 1.8 provides a very useful survey to gather information on and help support participants' different discussion styles and needs, exploring various areas like preferences for group size, ways of participating in discussions, any fears relating to discussions, etc.

average rating is 5 out of 5

YD

December 3, 2022 at 2:34:46 AM

Activity 5.8 further explores direct democracy by proposing the idea of "legislative juries" to improve the current initiative process through collaboration and deliberation. This activity uses role playing to have participants practice deliberation as part of a mock legislative jury to craft ballot initiatives on a given issue.

average rating is 5 out of 5

YD

December 3, 2022 at 2:27:35 AM

Activity 5.7 uses a fun and tactile activity like building LEGOs to explore the effects of coming together to colloborate and discuss, while also participating together in another physical activity.

average rating is 5 out of 5

YD

December 3, 2022 at 2:22:49 AM

Activity 5.6 uses memes and futuristic zombie scenarios to develop ways to change people's minds, while exploring various aspects of the methods used to change minds, like assumptions behind ideas, sticking to the facts versus stretching the truth, appealing to emotions etc.

average rating is 5 out of 5

YD

December 3, 2022 at 2:16:44 AM

Activity 5.5 uses a fun and visual/craft activity to help participants explore the many different types of knowledge, how they are valued, and the role/importance of each type of knowledge in their own lives.

average rating is 5 out of 5

YD

December 3, 2022 at 2:11:54 AM

Activity 5.3 gives participants to use writing, drawing, and/or speaking to share and discuss the various communities they belong to and/or feel excluded from, the various aspects that define community, as well as the practices of inclusion or exclusion and power distribution in these communities.

average rating is 5 out of 5

YD

December 3, 2022 at 2:07:26 AM

Activity 5.2 introduces four categories of stakeholders and multiple prompts to help participants work together in small and large groups to create comprehensive list of stakeholders, including those who are marginalized or not as obvious, for a given issue.

average rating is 5 out of 5

YD

December 3, 2022 at 2:04:00 AM

Activity 5.1 uses gamification by having participants play the Civics Topics Sweet Sixteen Competition to identify their issues they are passionate about both as individuals and as a group.

average rating is 5 out of 5

YD

December 3, 2022 at 2:01:34 AM

Activity 4.9 uses both lighthearted and serious characters, topics, and dialogue to help participants practice viewing an issue from the perspective of multiple people/characters and explain their thought processes and rationale for the choices they think these people will make in a given situation.

bottom of page