top of page

1.6 
Understanding Values in Context

Submitted by Lori Britt

This activity highlights how the ordering of values can change according to context. Often, discussion groups are not in conflict over the existence of specific values, but they are in tension about how these values are ordered differently for different discussants.

average rating is 5 out of 5, based on 3 votes, rating(s)
Peace sign formed with candles

Learning Goals

  • Understand how we rank and order values based on the context or issue.

  • Understand that we sometimes have very different interpretations of a value.

Instructions


Set Up: Prepare for the Activity

As the facilitator, select approximately ten values. Each value will be written on a slip of paper. Provide each participant with a set of common values written on small slips of paper. Sample values include: Security, Community, Prosperity, Responsibility, Inclusion, Equality, Tradition, Opportunity, Justice, Freedom, Innovation.


The facilitator should select values that are relevant for the discussion group.


Begin by introducing the learning goals of this activity.



Step One: Individually Identify and Rank Top 5 Values (5 min)

Distribute the sets of values to each participant. Ask them to rank these values by moving around the slips of paper. Their most important values should be at the top.


Ask them to identify their top five values. They will use these five slips of paper for the next steps of this activity.



Step Two: Share and Define Values (10 min)

Ask volunteers to name their top values. Once a few participants have shared their top values and some common themes emerge, invite participants to discuss how they defined these values. This can be done in small groups, if needed. The goal is to acknowledge that common values are often interpreted differently.



Step Three: Rank and Define Values in Response to Particular Issues (20 min)

The facilitator will Introduce a series of issues, such as: Gun Legislation, Loan Forgiveness, Vaccination, the Death Penalty.


For each topic, ask participants to re-sort their values. Discuss:

  • Did your top values shift? When? Why?

  • Did you reinterpret what any of the values meant in the context of a particular issue?



Step Four: Debrief as as Full Group (10 min)

Discuss:

  • How can understanding that many people share similar values but prioritize them differently help us work together in groups?

  • How might collaborative groups explore and find common values?

TIME

45

min

MODULE

Introduction to Collaborative Discussion

Tell us what you think. Rate and review this activity:

Have any helpful suggestions or modifications for this activity?

Share them in the comments below!

Rate this Activity (required)
Don’t love itNot greatGoodGreatLove it

0 Comments

average rating is 5 out of 5

YD

December 3, 2022 at 2:39:23 AM

Activity 5.4 uses the fun method of role playing and builds on other activities to help participants develop questions and practice gathering information to collaborate effectively with communities as partners. This activity involves working together in small groups and as a large group. It also includes multiple additional resources for participants to continue learning methods and skills to build community partnerships.

average rating is 5 out of 5

YD

December 3, 2022 at 2:39:00 AM

Activity 1.8 provides a very useful survey to gather information on and help support participants' different discussion styles and needs, exploring various areas like preferences for group size, ways of participating in discussions, any fears relating to discussions, etc.

average rating is 5 out of 5

YD

December 3, 2022 at 2:34:46 AM

Activity 5.8 further explores direct democracy by proposing the idea of "legislative juries" to improve the current initiative process through collaboration and deliberation. This activity uses role playing to have participants practice deliberation as part of a mock legislative jury to craft ballot initiatives on a given issue.

average rating is 5 out of 5

YD

December 3, 2022 at 2:27:35 AM

Activity 5.7 uses a fun and tactile activity like building LEGOs to explore the effects of coming together to colloborate and discuss, while also participating together in another physical activity.

average rating is 5 out of 5

YD

December 3, 2022 at 2:22:49 AM

Activity 5.6 uses memes and futuristic zombie scenarios to develop ways to change people's minds, while exploring various aspects of the methods used to change minds, like assumptions behind ideas, sticking to the facts versus stretching the truth, appealing to emotions etc.

average rating is 5 out of 5

YD

December 3, 2022 at 2:16:44 AM

Activity 5.5 uses a fun and visual/craft activity to help participants explore the many different types of knowledge, how they are valued, and the role/importance of each type of knowledge in their own lives.

average rating is 5 out of 5

YD

December 3, 2022 at 2:11:54 AM

Activity 5.3 gives participants to use writing, drawing, and/or speaking to share and discuss the various communities they belong to and/or feel excluded from, the various aspects that define community, as well as the practices of inclusion or exclusion and power distribution in these communities.

average rating is 5 out of 5

YD

December 3, 2022 at 2:07:26 AM

Activity 5.2 introduces four categories of stakeholders and multiple prompts to help participants work together in small and large groups to create comprehensive list of stakeholders, including those who are marginalized or not as obvious, for a given issue.

average rating is 5 out of 5

YD

December 3, 2022 at 2:04:00 AM

Activity 5.1 uses gamification by having participants play the Civics Topics Sweet Sixteen Competition to identify their issues they are passionate about both as individuals and as a group.

average rating is 5 out of 5

YD

December 3, 2022 at 2:01:34 AM

Activity 4.9 uses both lighthearted and serious characters, topics, and dialogue to help participants practice viewing an issue from the perspective of multiple people/characters and explain their thought processes and rationale for the choices they think these people will make in a given situation.

bottom of page