top of page

4.4
Identities & Issues Intersections

Submitted by Janice McMillan & Shannon Wheatley Hartman

This activity opens up complex thinking; it helps participants to understand issues of prejudice and stereotypes, and it also helps them to find ways of coming to consensus on issues that affect them.

average rating is 5 out of 5, based on 1 votes, rating(s)
Busy Tokyo intersection with crowds of people

Learning Goal

  • Examine how our views are shaped by many factors including the media, family, religion, class, racial and ethnic identities, etc.

Instructions


Set Up: Prepare for the Activity

Share the challenge shown below on a board, flipchart or shared document. Replace the issue mentioned with a pressing concern for your group.

Organize participants into pairs or small groups (3-4 ppl).

Begin by introducing the learning goals of this activity.



Step One: Review Challenge and Generate Characteristics (10 min)

Read the following challenge, or the modified version you created, to the group:

You have been asked to pull together a task team to communicate about Affordable Housing in your community. The task team needs to come up with ideas about how to build community cohesion and community interest around the topic of Affordable Housing.

Your group needs to select 8 people to join this team. As a group generate a list of characteristics that you would like team members to have (collectively or individually).


In small groups, invite participants to create a list of characteristics of ideal team members. Prompt:

  • What characteristics are we looking for in team members? You might want to frame this list as, “Someone who can….”

  • Generate a broad list. Don’t analyze or discuss the list, yet. Generate as many characteristics of ideal team members as you can.



Step Two: Rank Characteristics (10 min)

Invite participants to now individually review the list and select the top 10 characteristics of ideal team members.


Next, ask participants to compare their individual rankings and discuss with their group the criteria they each used. Ask them to discuss which characteristics are important for all team members and which ones are unique and are selected to improve the overall group dynamic.



Step Three: Create a Call for Volunteers (10 min)

As a group, ask them to decide on the top criteria for their team and draft a call for volunteers. Remind them to be specific about what they are looking for in team members.



Step Four: Share Descriptions with the Full Group (10 min)

Invite a representative from each small group to read their call for volunteers. While they are reading the description, ask other participants to listen for specific criteria.

Invite a pair of participants to record or capture criteria on the board, flip chart or shared document.



Step Five: Debrief as a Full Group (10 min)

  • Where is there consistent overlap? Why?

  • Are there any outliers? Why were these criteria chosen?

  • How important are diverse perspectives when dealing with complex issues? When might it be a hindrance? When might it be a benefit?

  • How would this description be different if it were a paid position? Nominated position?

  • As we look at our criteria, what sort of people do we think would be selected to the team? Who might be included? Excluded? Who is missing now that we are looking at this together and collectively?

TIME

50

min

MODULE

Culturally Responsive Collaboration

Tell us what you think. Rate and review this activity:

Have any helpful suggestions or modifications for this activity?

Share them in the comments below!

Rate this Activity (required)
Don’t love itNot greatGoodGreatLove it

0 Comments

average rating is 5 out of 5

YD

December 3, 2022 at 2:39:23 AM

Activity 5.4 uses the fun method of role playing and builds on other activities to help participants develop questions and practice gathering information to collaborate effectively with communities as partners. This activity involves working together in small groups and as a large group. It also includes multiple additional resources for participants to continue learning methods and skills to build community partnerships.

average rating is 5 out of 5

YD

December 3, 2022 at 2:39:00 AM

Activity 1.8 provides a very useful survey to gather information on and help support participants' different discussion styles and needs, exploring various areas like preferences for group size, ways of participating in discussions, any fears relating to discussions, etc.

average rating is 5 out of 5

YD

December 3, 2022 at 2:34:46 AM

Activity 5.8 further explores direct democracy by proposing the idea of "legislative juries" to improve the current initiative process through collaboration and deliberation. This activity uses role playing to have participants practice deliberation as part of a mock legislative jury to craft ballot initiatives on a given issue.

average rating is 5 out of 5

YD

December 3, 2022 at 2:27:35 AM

Activity 5.7 uses a fun and tactile activity like building LEGOs to explore the effects of coming together to colloborate and discuss, while also participating together in another physical activity.

average rating is 5 out of 5

YD

December 3, 2022 at 2:22:49 AM

Activity 5.6 uses memes and futuristic zombie scenarios to develop ways to change people's minds, while exploring various aspects of the methods used to change minds, like assumptions behind ideas, sticking to the facts versus stretching the truth, appealing to emotions etc.

average rating is 5 out of 5

YD

December 3, 2022 at 2:16:44 AM

Activity 5.5 uses a fun and visual/craft activity to help participants explore the many different types of knowledge, how they are valued, and the role/importance of each type of knowledge in their own lives.

average rating is 5 out of 5

YD

December 3, 2022 at 2:11:54 AM

Activity 5.3 gives participants to use writing, drawing, and/or speaking to share and discuss the various communities they belong to and/or feel excluded from, the various aspects that define community, as well as the practices of inclusion or exclusion and power distribution in these communities.

average rating is 5 out of 5

YD

December 3, 2022 at 2:07:26 AM

Activity 5.2 introduces four categories of stakeholders and multiple prompts to help participants work together in small and large groups to create comprehensive list of stakeholders, including those who are marginalized or not as obvious, for a given issue.

average rating is 5 out of 5

YD

December 3, 2022 at 2:04:00 AM

Activity 5.1 uses gamification by having participants play the Civics Topics Sweet Sixteen Competition to identify their issues they are passionate about both as individuals and as a group.

average rating is 5 out of 5

YD

December 3, 2022 at 2:01:34 AM

Activity 4.9 uses both lighthearted and serious characters, topics, and dialogue to help participants practice viewing an issue from the perspective of multiple people/characters and explain their thought processes and rationale for the choices they think these people will make in a given situation.

bottom of page