top of page

5.4
Seeing Communities as Partners

Submitted by Ritu Thomas

This activity helps participants think of communities as partners, rather than recipients of funding, information, or external expertise. Instead of seeing them as having problems that "we'' need to solve, it enables participants to see a community’s existing assets and capacities to solve problems.

average rating is 5 out of 5, based on 1 votes, rating(s)
Wall with splashes of colorful paint and the word together written on it

Learning Goals

  • Understand the existing strengths of a community and how to support existing momentum to solve problems.

  • Appreciate the need to engage with the willingness to learn and follow rather than lead.

Instructions


Set Up: Prepare for the Activity

Select a topic that is important to your discussion group, something they are passionate about or where they see the need for change. As preparation for this activity, consider doing Activity 5.1 Identifying Your Civic Passion to identify an issue and Activity 5.2 Developing an Awareness of Stakeholders to have participants generate stakeholders in prior sessions.


Share a list of 2, 3 or 4 community stakeholders for this issue, depending on the total number of people that will be in each small group (i.e. 4, 6 or 8 people), as a handout or shared document (refer to this Identifying Stakeholders Worksheet).


Prepare an information sheet about each community stakeholder that describes their:

  • views on different aspects of this issue

  • lived experience of the problem

  • definition of the problem

  • individual assets/resources, like individual capabilities, knowledge, connections

  • community’s common assets and resources, like buildings, spaces, equipment

  • community organizations, groups, or local businesses


Don’t share these detailed information sheets with participants yet.


Organize participants into small groups (4-8 ppl).

Begin by introducing the learning goals of this activity.




Step One: Develop “Good Questions” (10 min)

In these small groups, invite participants to refer to the list of stakeholders provided for the chosen issue and work together to create two sets of "good questions" using this Question Chart:

  • A list of questions that gathers information on the community members/stakeholders’ definition and framing of an issue/topic and their perspective on this issue/topic.

  • A list of questions that gathers information on what assets and resources exist in the community. These could be the individual capabilities, knowledge, or connections of community members; buildings, spaces or equipment; community organizations, groups, or businesses; etc.



Step Two: Provide Information on the Community to One Subgroup (5 min)

Within each small group, have participants break into 2 subgroups:

  • The first subgroup will be the Community Member group - each person will role-play one of the stakeholders/community members.

  • The second subgroup will be the Data Gathering group that will gather information from the community members.


Provide the Community Member subgroups with the information sheet about each community stakeholder.


The Data Gathering subgroup does not receive this information.



Step Three: Separately Develop an Initial Plan (10 min)

Invite each subgroup to work separately to define the problem as they see it and quickly draft an initial plan for a solution.



Step Four: Collaboratively Develop a Revised Plan (20 min)

Have the two subgroups come back together.

In each small group, ask the Data Gathering subgroup to use the two lists of questions to engage in a dialogue with the Community Member subgroup and gather information on the community members’ definitions and perspectives of the problem, as well as individual and community assets & resources.


Have both groups then work together to draft a new joint proposal using the new insight and information they gained from their discussion with each other.


Once each small group is finished, have them write both their initial and updated proposals on a whiteboard, shared screen or other surface visible to everyone.



Step Five: Debrief as a Full Group (10 min)

Discuss the results:

  • How did the proposals change with new information?

  • What assumptions did each subgroup have about the issue that they were able to move beyond after talking to each other?



TIME

55

min

MODULE

Civic Collaboration

Tell us what you think. Rate and review this activity:

Have any helpful suggestions or modifications for this activity?

Share them in the comments below!

Rate this Activity (required)
Don’t love itNot greatGoodGreatLove it

0 Comments

average rating is 5 out of 5

Shannon Wheatley Hartman

December 7, 2022 at 7:01:33 PM

Another all time favorite. I really recommend this activity when you are trying to think about the complexity of a social topic and who/what is impacted by it. It pairs well with the Divergent Thinking/Surround the Topic activity. This activity also includes a really helpful worksheet for capturing types of stakeholders.

average rating is 5 out of 5

Shannon Wheatley Hartman

December 7, 2022 at 6:59:07 PM

I really like this activity. It is a fun way to figure out what matters most to us as a group. For example, if you need to figure out the theme for a discussion series or a topic for a group project, try out this activity. It helps participants to reflect on their own civic passion but also negotiate together the civic passions of the group. It could be paired with the value activities in Module One.

average rating is 5 out of 5

Shannon Wheatley Hartman

December 7, 2022 at 6:54:13 PM

I the process in this activity ("surround the topic") a lot. It is particularly useful as facilitation preparation. It also helps with generative thinking.

average rating is 5 out of 5

Shannon Wheatley Hartman

December 7, 2022 at 6:52:01 PM

This is an all time favorite. Use it as a warm-up activity or whenever you have a group that feels stuck and can't think of new ways of engaging a topic or problem.

average rating is 5 out of 5

Shannon Wheatley Hartman

December 7, 2022 at 6:49:22 PM

Similar to the previous activity (1.7 Taking Inventory of CD Skills), this activity includes a google survey that participants can complete at the beginning of a program or class. Instructors or facilitators can use this information to then tailor future activities to best fits the discussion needs of their group.

average rating is 5 out of 5

Shannon Wheatley Hartman

December 7, 2022 at 6:46:46 PM

Use this as pre-class or pre-workshop preparation! These self-evaluations will help teachers or facilitators to better understand the starting point of each participant and an aggregate view of the group. The survey results are shared only with the instructor/facilitator. This is a really helpful resource (and you can modify the survey to fit your needs).

average rating is 5 out of 5

Shannon Wheatley Hartman

December 7, 2022 at 6:43:42 PM

This activity and the previous (1.5 Understanding Values) are great for difficult conversations. I would use this as the prep work before diving into potentially tricky conversations. It helps participants to look for the values that inform opinions (and not just dismiss ideas that they don't like).

average rating is 5 out of 5

Shannon Wheatley Hartman

December 7, 2022 at 6:41:01 PM

This is also known as "Identity Pie." It's a great warm up and way for participants to get to know one another. I would use this early in a group setting to help build connection.

average rating is 5 out of 5

Shannon Wheatley Hartman

December 7, 2022 at 6:39:24 PM

I think we all know that creating guidelines is important. I introduce activity 1.1 What is Collaborative Learning? first and then use the positive and negative attributes that they generate to help form our group guidelines.

average rating is 5 out of 5

Shannon Wheatley Hartman

December 7, 2022 at 6:36:43 PM

I always recommend that folks start off with this activity and pair it with 1.3 Creating Guidelines. It is a great way to set the tone and emphasize the importance of collaborative discussion.

bottom of page